Obama’s 32 Czar’s

A Washington Post Op-Ed by Eric Cantor hits the president’s Czars.
By Eric CantorThursday, July 30, 2009

The biggest problems that we’re facing right now have to do with George Bush trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all. And that’s what I intend to reverse when I’m president of the United States.” — Sen. Barack Obama, March 31, 2008
To say President Obama failed to follow through on this promise is an understatement. By appointing a virtual army of “czars” — each wholly unaccountable to Congress yet tasked with spearheading major policy efforts for the White House — in his first six months, the president has embarked on an end-run around the legislative branch of historic proportions.
To be sure, the appointment of a few special officers to play a constructive role in a given administration is nothing new. Hardening of arteries affects the flow of blood to veins order viagra from india while sexual act. For a considerable length of time, people experiencing sexual issues have searched forward for methods for curing their problems. online viagra sales Symptoms of myofascial dysfunction include: Deep ache, tightness or tenderness in muscles Reduced range of motion and sports performance. buying viagra in australia Prolonged intake viagra purchase buy icks.org of certain medicines for diseases such as obesity, diabetes, hair loss and hypertension are the common causes for lack of sex drive in women is even more common than in men. What is new is the elevation of so many czars, with so much authority on endless policy fronts. Vesting such broad authority in the hands of people not subjected to Senate confirmation and congressional oversight poses a grave threat to our system of checks and balances.
At last count, there were at least 32 active czars that we knew of, meaning the current administration has more czars than Imperial Russia. Read it all.

In spite of this having been done in the past, I do wonder has no one has questioned the constitutionality of it.?

This entry was posted in Czars. Bookmark the permalink.