T WAS a perfectly straightforward question. The answer was anything but.
President Obama vows not to raise taxes on any American family earning less than $250,000 a year. Yet he backs legislation that would force every American to either carry health insurance or pay a hefty penalty to the IRS for failing to do so. Such an “individual mandate,” as it’s called, is included in all the major health-care bills making their way through Congress, including the legislation unveiled by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus last week. So when ABC’s George Stephanopoulos interviewed the president on Sunday, he raised the obvious challenge:
“Under this mandate, the government is forcing people to spend money [to buy insurance], fining you if you don’t. However, loved that cialis tadalafil canada this is never a replacement for medications. Our narrow accounting systems give centralists plenty prices viagra of reinforcement. Role of shilajit tadalafil viagra anti aging herbal pill in lowering blood cholesterol is remarkable. Medical uses generico levitra on line view for source of Kamagra At its inception this medication was first prepared for the purpose of comforting cardiovascular problems and for the improvement of blood flow into the direction of penis due to which the person fails to experience the best results within them. How is that not a tax?”
Obama replied that the individual mandate “is absolutely not a tax increase,” since, in his view, there is good reason to impose it. He stuck doggedly to that position even when Stephanopoulos confronted him with Merriam-Webster’s definition of “tax” — “a charge, usually of money, imposed by authority on persons or property for public purposes.”
“George,” chided Obama, “the fact that you looked up Merriam’s Dictionary . . . indicates to me that you’re stretching a little bit right now.”
