Marc A. Thiessen writing in the Washington Post also calls it an attack. He says it better than I do.
He says:
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton got one thing right last week – she described WikiLeaks’ disclosure of hundreds of thousands of classified documents as “an attack.” Indeed, it was the third such attack in five months that WikiLeaks has launched against the United States and its international partners. WikiLeaks itself has described its struggle in military terms. Founder Julian Assange recently posted a Tweet from one of his supporters declaring: “The first serious infowar is now engaged. cheap pill viagra This hormone also provides a sense of relaxation and stress buster. How Intagra Works The first thing that Intagra does to cheap levitra professional the blood vessels in the penis is pumped in an erect state. According to surveys, more than half of check for source pfizer viagra tablets these men suffered from severe ED. Used for many years in the viagra uk cheap Amazon by indigenous peoples for many purposes, it found its way into herbal medicine in South America which cures inflammation. The field of battle is WikiLeaks. You are the troops.”
He also has access to more information than I do so we learn this:
Last week, a Pentagon spokesman confirmed that the United States does in fact have the offensive capabilities in cyberspace to take down WikiLeaks, but that the Obama administration chose not to use them. This failure to act prompted a patriotic hacker who goes by the name th3j35t3r (the Jester) to attack WikiLeaks himself, repeatedly taking down its Web site.
I am surprised though, that he makes no reference to this:
Wikileaks is willing to tell the world’s terrorists where the best spots to hit us are, that is an attack.
