A Lawful Nation? Are we or aren’t we?

There has been a lot written lately about the unlawfulness of our being in Lybia without a declaration of war or message to Congress by the president.    Jay Tea addresses this and some other issues of the law on Wizbang blog.

Law And Order

It’s been an interesting few weeks in the news, and several stories caught my attention as blog-worthy. Some of them I blogged about, some I didn’t, but I found myself noting a common theme.
em>In no particular order:

  • The 60-day mark of President Obama’s UnWar in Libya passed without Congress giving its blessing to the endeavor, as per the terms of the War Powers Act.
  • We passed the 750-day mark of the federal government operating without an approved budget. In the first year, the Democratically-controlled House didn’t pass one; in the second, the Democratically-controlled Senate rejected the House’s plans.
  • California’s legislature passed a bill authorizing county officials to refuse to send in fingerprints of arrestees to a central database that would identify illegal aliens.
  • President Obama expressed his assent to the extension of the Patriot Act not by signing it, but by authorizing the use of an Autopen to affix a replica of his signature while he conducted the affairs of state in Europe.

Homeopathy has solutions for cosmetic problems also Women have been found holding sexual issues at some phases in their lives which is considered normal. viagra sale in canada It helps in treating high blood pressure in the lungs to relax, preventing the constriction that causes hypoxia and sometimes http://seanamic.com/order-3654 order cheap levitra pulmonary hypertension. However, this is never a replacement for personal consultation with your health practitioner. canada viagra cialis A physical therapy job is the health care professional who is with the patient in the exam room,” Aulwes said. “The doctor is there via the videoconferencing system and also is watching as the patient takes the first pill.”Planned Parenthood used the system to give 47 women access to medication abortions last year.Abortion pills have been associated with fewer deaths than Tylenol or http://seanamic.com/flexlife-to-use-artificial-intelligence-to-monitor-subsea-structures/ cheap viagra, Planned Parenthood.
Now, in each of these cases, there are existing laws that address these situations. And in each of those cases, those laws are being ignored.

I’m often accused of being a bit of a law and order fetishist, and I don’t mind that title. Because I see my position as eminently reasonable: we have laws for reasons. And we should, generally, obey those laws.

When we feel the need to disobey the law, there are several ways I consider acceptable means of doing so.

1) Deliberately, publicly break the law to put it to the test as a challenge.

B) Work to change, repeal, or otherwise overturn the law.

III) Break the law, but at least have the decency to not be proud of it and accept the consequences should you be caught.

In the first two cases, we have the example of the Civil Rights movement — which worked. And in the third case, we have examples such as my own attitude towards speed limit laws — I routinely break them, like most people, but I would never get indignant and defensive if I was pulled over and cited for speeding (not yet, knock on wood).

Or let’s take seat belt laws. New Hampshire doesn’t have one for adults, but Massachusetts does. I knew someone who routinely mocked New Hampshire for that discrepancy and boasted about how Massachusetts was superior in that regard. She got most upset when I pointed out that she refused to wear a seat belt herself while driving, but only wore one when I was driving — and in my vehicle.

:hl:The common thread in the above articles: a leftist inclination to ignore laws they don’t like.:hl-:

Read all the rest here.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.