What’s next, Mr. Podesta? asks the Wall Street Journal

From WSJ’s Washington Wire blog:

Many other men are suffering from an buy levitra line purchasing here injury or illness. Supplement D3 is produced by people in the epidermis when it is revealed to ultraviolet-B (UVB) light from natural light. best cheap viagra Studies have confirmed this during generika tadalafil 20mg a survey help in the United Kingdom. Those who prefer faster results need to seek allopathic medications like Silagra tablets that provide male reproductive organ erection for 4 to 6 hours, by dilating penile arteries, coffee can work a natural way of doing cheap female viagra so and you can maintain your anonymity.

By Jonathan Weisman
If you want to see where President Barack Obama’s response to the Deepwater Horizon disaster is heading, try following the urgings of the Center for American Progress.
The liberal think tank with close White House ties appears to have more influence on spill policy than the president’s in-house advisers. On May 4, for instance, the CAP’s energy and environment expert, Daniel Weiss, called on the president to name an independent commission to look at the causes of the Deepwater Horizon disaster. On May 22, he did just that.
On May 21, CAP president, John Podesta, privately implored White House officials to name someone to be the public point person for the spill response. A week later, the White House announced that Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen would hold daily briefings on the spill, wherever he would be on any given day.
On May 26, Weiss said the White House needed to demand that BP immediately set up an escrow account with billions of dollars from which claims for Gulf state residents would be paid out.
Monday’s headlines proclaimed the president’s latest get-tough stand: BP needs to set up a billion-dollar escrow account.
What’s next, Mr. Podesta?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.